Documentary Evaluation
For the
documentary I believe my group started off well. Oliver, Nick and I met up and
discussed our ideas and what was to be pitched in the seminar group. We had two
good ideas, one being similar to the Skateistan documentary, however it would
be in a well known skate park in Liverpool and we would be interviewing
employees of the skate park and asking for stories or asking regular members of
the skate park. The aim for this idea was to make it different to other skate
documentaries by talking about personal experience within the park rather than
just advertising it in a way. I tended to gravitate towards the second idea as
it was an interesting and different subject to the usual ideas. Oliver found a
website which had an archive of images of Liverpool during the Second World
War. And finding the source of the archive, we wanted to interview the owner
and ask about his inspiration towards the images and then connect the World War
II images with images of Liverpool in 2015. The pitch in the seminar group went
well as we provided a power point presentation unlike any other group and
provided some visuals. We finalised that we would proceed with the World War II
archive idea and proceeded to develop it into a narrative and construct an
interview whilst contacting the owner to make sure we could interview him. When
it came to the day of travelling to Liverpool, we received an email to say we
could not interview the owner of the archive due to more than reasonable
circumstances and therefore, we had no idea. Also, two members of our group had
not been able to come, one of them I did not expect any contribution from them
whatsoever but the other had good reasons not to come. Leaving Oliver and I
alone on the trip. Luckily, this happened to another group in Liverpool as well
so we could join to make a group and they had a good idea when pitched to us
and we took over the roles that were free. The idea was very interesting as it
is of a boat called the Ellan Vannin, that had sunk in the Liverpool River a
few years before The Titanic had gone down, therefore, no one really knew about
it as The Titanic overlooked it. There was also a poem that went with the boat
which we would use in our final piece. One thing was lacking though which was
an interview. The first day after resolving our problems, we went to the marina
and museum in Liverpool as a new group to scout the location and finalise what
was to be filmed the next day and what we could use. My role being the sound
recordist with Oliver, we began searching for sounds we could record around the
marina as well as in the museum and noting them down. The second day we took
our equipment to the marina and we split into two groups for the first half of
the shoot. Oliver and I stayed around the marina capturing sounds of the river
crashing on the walls, seagulls flying by and footsteps across the bridges.
Also, getting some footage using the second camera to use as cutaways and
general footage around the area that could be used. When in the museum I wanted
sounds of the people talking and walking around and also a guide talking about
one of the boats in the museum. Plus, sounds within the library such as book
pages being turned over. The third day was planned to interview a member of the
museum that knew information about the boat we was documenting but it turned
out that we had missed them or they did not have time so the group was worried
but Kelly mentioned how she came up with the idea of the Ellan Vannin from a
family friend and that we could interview him after the Liverpool trip.
Therefore, we left Liverpool and Kelly went to visit the family friend and
interviewed him herself as he lived away from Sheffield. An original group
member was supposed to edit the footage we had taken from Liverpool, however
they decided not to for some reason and then Tom began to edit. I began doing
some sound design and as it was my first time using the software I learnt some
new techniques such as using noise reduction and EQ. Oliver then took over the
edit as we all stayed to chip in and help with the post-production. The edit
was getting so close to being done when someone noticed that most of the
footage had disappeared from Avid and most of it had to be started all over
again within only a day or two to go before it was to be presented. Oliver and
I then stayed till late hours in the edit suite to make sure we had a
documentary to present and we also ordered pizza to the University to maximise
our work ethic. All in all, the Liverpool trip was a very enjoyable experience
as was making a documentary. However, improvements could have been made to our
final piece such as getting a lot more footage that relates to the story in
order for it to be more enjoyable to watch. Interchanging the poem and
information from the interview with live footage of the marina and sounds to
engage the viewers a lot more as the end piece needed to have a bit more pace
or some change in pace. However, it was full of information about the Ellan
Vannin and the footage and sounds and final edit still had a good flow.
Drama Evaluation
For the
drama I believe my group started off well again, we met up to discuss ideas and
we had more than enough to choose from. My idea for the drama was to have a
main character that would be heavily invested in keeping his desk area clean
and organised and when it was not to their satisfaction, it would make them
very uncomfortable and would be constantly trying to perfect it. There would
also be a second character that would be a counter part to the main character.
This character would come into the desk space and make mess or tamper with it
unintentionally, leaving crumbs or cutlery on the desk for example, leaving the
main character always cleaning up after them and re-organising their desk space
in order to feel comfortable with it again. This idea would use extreme close
ups and slows in order to show the opposite emotion between the two characters.
My idea was chosen a long with another in which would contain a relationship
between two characters that use post it notes as communication. And using the
post it notes specifically to show the journey between their relationship and
use one defying shot of a room filled with post it notes. The two ideas were
presented in the seminar group and it was decided that we should combine the
two ideas together. Roles were then chosen in our group, Oliver director, Kelly
producer, Nick on sound and cinematography for me and so Oliver and I began
writing the script with Oliver eventually taking over the full script as he was
director. Dan then joined our group as we had a session in the studio in which
we would have actors read over our scripts and re-enact a scene so we could get
a visual of how it would look. It was a great opportunity for us and it gave me
an insight of what camera shots Oliver wanted to use. Although the actors were
great during the session, we did not have any actors to use on the actual
shoot. Leaving us to use Kelly as the female character and George, Nick’s friend,
as the male. We also had issues with our location, the original use of a house
did not come through and we had to use a student house which was not as bad as
I had thought. The day of the shoot we gathered at University to grab equipment
and then transport it to the location. A clamp was missing from our slider unfortunately
so when it came to an outside scene it was hard to use the slider as it would
not move as freely and smoothly as we wanted. Therefore, the shots were not as
good as hoped. Dan and I had been swapping over camera through the first half
of the day due to us having the same role, except for the scenes where we used
two cameras. And, later in the day Dan would shift over to lighting and I took
over cinematography altogether. I think the shoot went well throughout as we
got a lot of footage and most of what Oliver wanted to capture. However, we had
overestimated five minutes of film time and if all of the footage was to be
used it would have ended at around eight minutes of film. Therefore, a lot of
footage was taken out in post-production and that is when the film began to
lose its sense and there became a lot of holes in the narrative. The film tends
to jump from scene to scene with some continuity issues. A few times this
happens in when April changes clothes between scenes when she should not have.
And others where Dillon goes into the kitchen and does not find a post it note
on the wall where they usually should. Plus, a bedroom scene where Dillon walks
in on April lounging around and all of a sudden, they just start arguing with
no real ignition due to certain clip or sound not being added to save time.
However, I think the film is still relatively understandable and it still has a
flow to it and changes in pace to show the tension building and when it is calm
between the relationship. And, there is a clear journey and development between
the two characters. I say we did a good job for a tiring thirteen hour shoot.
Throughout post-production Oliver was in control of the final edit, with Nick
doing a lot of sound design. With Dan and I always there and involved with the
edit to chip in. As there was two days to edit, Dan and I became runners for
Oliver, getting food and drink here and there. When presented Oliver explained
the holes and issues we had in our film very clearly for Dom and the rest of the
group to understand, which helped us out a lot. Overall, it was a great
experience and enjoyable for me as I had a group I liked to work with and we
all had a similar vision we wanted. Even though there was a lot to improve such
as time to prevent holes in the narrative. Specifically for me, I enjoyed my
role of cinematography and using the techniques I wanted to use such as
handheld shots and getting crisp footage. And, I have taken the cinematography
module for the second year so it really helped me to experiment with the
cameras and prepare me for the second year.



































